Law and Public Policy
Share |

Mission Statement: The ACJS Law and Public Policy Section (LPPS) seeks to raise the awareness of ACJS members to law and policy concerns relevant to criminal justice issues. Our objective is to support members of the ACJS with research, curriculum development and networking.  Individuals are encouraged to offer their academic findings to all level of governments for law and policy development.

Membership:  Any current member of ACJS is welcome as a new member of the Law and Public Policy Section. Section dues are $10. To join the section, current ACJS members should send a request to receive an invoice, which you can pay by check or credit card to the National Office at; Non-members of ACJS first join ACJS via the Membership page - and add the LPPS as a Section option before you check-out and pay.

Section Journal:  In Fall 2017 the Journal of Criminal Justice and Law was formally adopted as the official journal of the Law and Public Policy Section. The Journal of Criminal Justice and Law: A Publication of the Law and Public Policy Section of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (JCJL/LPPS) is a peer reviewed journal with a focus on both criminal justice and legal issues and their intersection with public policy.

The goal of the JCJL/LPPS is to address the lack of outlets in criminal justice research dealing with legal issues. The mission of the JCJL/LPPS is to publish high quality empirical, qualitative and legal research on legal issues in criminal justice and law.


To view the Spring 2020 Issue - click here. This issue (Volume 3, Issue 2) includes:

Determining Intellectual Disability in Death Penalty Cases: A State-by- State Analysis
by Jennifer LaPrade and John L. Worrall

The Life-Course of Juvenile Lifers: Understanding Maturation and Development as Miller and Its Progeny Guide Juvenile Life Sentence Release Decisions
by Robert Johnson and Margaret E. Leigey

The Science of Deception Detection: A Literature and Policy Review on Police Ability to Detect Lies
by Jillian R. Yarbrough

Executive Officers for 2020-2022
Chair - Arthur H. Garrison, LP.D., Kutztown University of Pennsylvania
Vice Chair - Vacant
Secretary - Melanie Worsley, J.D., Washburn University
Executive Counselor - Brenda Rowe, J.D., Ph.D., Texas A&M University-San Antonio
Executive Counselor - Michelle M. Watson, J.D., Washburn University
Executive Counselor - Charles E. "Chuck" MacLean, M.B.A, J.D., Ph.D., Metropolitan State University


Annual Meeting, March 2019 (Baltimore):

The section hosted two showcase events.


The first showcase was Law and Public Policy Showcase: Section Journal Special Issue: Race, Police, and Criminal Justice. The panel was comprised of authors from the special issue of the section journal. The panel was moderated by the journal managing editor Arthur Garrison, Kutztown University. The panelists were Dale Willits, Washington State University, Heidi S. Bonner, East Carolina University, and Andrew Costello, NYIT.


The second showcase was Race and Police Shooting Data Analysis: The Science and Disputes on Race Causation. Panelists debated the state of science in using police shooting databases, including the Washington Post, to determine relationships between police use of force and race.  The panel was moderated by Arthur Garrison, Kutztown University and the panelists were Geoffrey P. Alpert, University of South Carolina and Griffith University, Jon Shane, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Scott Bowman, Texas State University and Justin Nix, University of Nebraska Omaha.


From right to left: Dale Willits, Washington State University, Heidi S. Bonner, East Carolina University, and Andrew Costello, NYIT.


Annual Meeting, February 2018 (New Orleans):


The Law and Public Policy Section organized three showcase panels for the February 2018 Annual Meeting.


The first panel was Law and Public Policy Section Showcase: Reflections on Crime and the Criminal Justice System.  The panel was comprised of practitioners and community leaders who discussed the causes of crime and how crime policy should be constructed. Panelists discussed both the politics and policy of criminal justice operations.


The second panel was Law and Public Policy Section Showcase: Reflections on Race, Crime and Politics. The panelist of criminal justice practitioners the issue of crime and race, particularly slavery to Jim Crow, the disproportionate incarceration of Blacks has been a topic of debate within the Academy and American politics. Theories on crime and race have ranged from the criminal justice system being racist to Blacks being criminogenic either by birth or by culture. Panelists of criminal justice practitioners will discuss the issue of crime and race.


Both panels hosted local New Orleans criminal justice and policy leaders.



From right to left: Flozell Daniels, Jr., Board of Directors, Chair of the New Orleans Urban League Policy Committee, Norma Broussard DuBois, Director of Felony DWI & Traffic Safety Outreach Jefferson Parish District Attorney, Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., Orleans Parish District Attorney and  Arthur Garrison, moderator, Law and Public Policy Chair.


The second panel was Law and Public Policy Section Showcase: The Goal of the Academy, Politics or Science?.  The panelist discussed the issue that each year hundreds of articles and studies are published by academics on the causes of crime and theories on how to address the operation of the criminal justice system. The conclusions of these many studies are used to support the liberal or conservative political agendas of policy makers and politicians.



From top left to right: Arthur Garrison, Section Chair and Moderator, Faith Lutze, Washington State University; Francis M. Williams, Plymouth State University; Jason Williams, Montclair State University; Michael J. DeValve, Fayetteville State University; seated left to right: John Paul Wright, University of Cincinnati and Delores Jones-Brown, Professor, John Jay College (Retired)


Annual Meeting, March 2017 (Kansas City):


The Law and Public Policy Section organized two showcase panels at the March 2017 Annual Meeting.


The first panel was Law and Public Policy Showcase Event: American Law Enforcement – What Police Want CJ Scholars to Understand about Policing. The panelist discussed the literature of policing in America provides both depth and width in understating police operations, police administration and policy psychology. The purpose of the panel was to provide an avenue for five local police chiefs to discuss their perspectives and critiques on how the profession of policing is studied by the Academy and how its research could improve policing on the street and operational levels.


The second panel was Law and Public Policy Showcase Event: The “Ferguson Effect” Race and Police Interactions: Academics and Media Portrayals.  In light of the events in New York (Eric Gardner), Baltimore (Freddie Gray), Ferguson (Michael Brown), Chicago (Laquan McDonald), Cleveland (Tamir Rice and John Crawford), St. Paul (Philando Castile), and Baton Rouge (Alton Sterling) among many other recent incidents of police use of deadly force on Black males; a narrative has developed that police are killing Blacks with impunity.  A panel of police chiefs discussed their perspectives on police use of force, types of force, race and policing, the intentional ambush and killings of police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge, the legitimacy of the “Ferguson Effect” and how the police are portrayed in the media. The chiefs reflected on whether the dynamics of race and policing is as bad as the academy and the media portray it to be and what impact does the media and the Academy have on street level policing in Black and minority communities.


Both panels hosted local police chiefs from the Kansas City area.

From left to right panelists: Chris Skinrood, Chief, Riverside Missouri Police Department; Robert Kuehl, Major, Deputy Superintendent, Kansas Regional Police Academy, Arthur H. Garrison, panel moderator, Chair of Law and Public Policy Section; Det. Brad Lemon, President & Department Liaison, Kansas City, MO Police Union; and Captain Charles Huth, Staff Inspector, Chief’s Office, Kansas City Police Department.


Section Awards:  Each year the section selects a local criminal justice professional in the location of the ACJS Annual Meeting whose work has been outstanding and innovative within the field of criminal justice. The recipients of the Law and Public Policy Justice Policy Innovator Award have been a diverse group of men and women.

Criteria: The Justice Policy Innovator Award recipient shall be a person who has made a significant and recognized contribution to the quality and improvement of criminal justice by implementing legal and/or criminal justice policy innovations. Designees may be citizens acting in civil society, employees and/or administrators of criminal justice agencies, members of the judiciary and/or the legal profession or academicians.  

The annual designee is selected by the executive board of the Law & Public Policy Section.  Please send nominations by October 15, 2019 to the Chair: Arthur Garrison,


2019, Baltimore
No award given


Past Winners:

2018, New Orleans

Andrea Armstrong


2018 Winner Justice Policy Innovator Award, Andrea Armstrong pictured with Section Chair, Arthur H. Garrison.


Andrea Armstrong is a professor of law at Loyola University New Orleans, College of Law and a founding member of the Promise of Justice Initiative--a non-profit dedicated to the humane, fair, and equal treatment of individuals in the criminal justice system. Her work in criminal justice includes death penalty reform, conditions of confinement, eliminating poor representation of criminal defendants and ending racial discrimination in the criminal justice system. She serves on the board of the Capital Appeals Project.


2017, Kansas City
No award given

2016, Denver
Mitchell R. Morrissey


At the 2016 Law and Public Policy Section meeting in Denver, Colorado: From left to right: Melanie Worsley (Section Secretary), Brenda Rowe, Greggory LaBerge, Director, Forensics and Evidence Division, Denver D.A. Office – representing Mitchell R. Morrissey (2016 award recipient), Arthur H. Garrison (Section Chair), Amy Memaen. 

Mitchell R. Morrissey was elected District Attorney of Denver in November 2004 and was sworn into office on January 11, 2005. As the chief prosecutor for the Second Judicial District he is responsible for the prosecution of more than 6,000 felony and 18,000 misdemeanor criminal cases every year. He is nationally known for his expertise in DNA technology, applying that technology in criminal prosecutions and working to ensure that DNA science is admissible in our courtrooms. He recognized the potential of DNA science early on and prosecuted the first trial in Denver to utilize DNA. Mr. Morrissey is nationally recognized for establishing a systematic process for the use of DNA evidence to solve cold cases and DNA familial searches to identify suspects in rape and property crime cases; twenty-one percent of property crimes leave blood and saliva evidence. Mr. Morrissey believes that a prosecutor should be academically minded as well as practical in approaching methods for solving crime.

2015, Orlando
Robert Westley


At the 2015 Law and Public Policy Section meeting in Orlando Florida: From left to right: Randall Grometstein (Immediate Past Chair), John Cencich (Vice Chair), Robert Westley (2015 award recipient), Arthur H. Garrison (Section Chair), Brenda Riley and David Jones.

Robert Westley, Public Defender, 9th Judicial Circuit Orange and Osceolo Counties Florida. Mr. Westley in an elected Public Defender with a dedication to making sure all defendants are to be treated as human beings by both his attorneys and the criminal justice system. He operationalizes this principle by telling his public defenders, “never waive speedy trial” and “always be ready to go to trial.” Mr. Westley asserts that by doing these two things consistently, you will always get the best result for your client. When it comes to pleas and engaging the prosecutor, he says, “Be a warrior and you will be treated as a warrior, be a beggar and you will be treated as a beggar.”

2014, Philadelphia
Dr. John Kramer, of Penn State University, for his career as both an academic and a practitioner. Dr. Kramer was the executive director of the Pennsylvania Sentencing Commission (1979-1988) and staff director of the U.S. Sentencing Commission (1996-1998).

2013, Dallas
Craig Watkins, Dallas County District Attorney, for his creation of the Conviction Integrity Unit that reviews and re-investigates legitimate post-conviction claims of innocence.

2012, New York
Michael Jacobson, Director, Vera Institute, for his career of policy innovation and research as a government analyst, director of the New York City Correctional Agency, academic and head of a leading criminal justice policy and research organization.

2011, Toronto        
Stephen Goudge, Ontario Court of Appeals judge, for his role as the Commissioner of the Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario, Canada.

2010, San Diego     
George “Woody” Clark, San Diego trial court judge, for initiating a DNA review program as assistant prosecutor.

Section Updates:


At the business meeting at the 2019 ACJS conference in Baltimore the members discussed the feasibility of establishing two awards, one for new law and public policy scholars and one for senior scholars, as a possible replacement for the innovators award. The members decided that although the idea of recognizing both emerging and established scholars would be a good for the section, establishing such awards would take away from the innovators award which is designed to recognize criminal justice practitioners in the field. Members discussed better strategies for recognizing such practitioners. It was decided that the innovators award would remain the exclusive award of the section. A report was given regarding the section journal. The journal published a special issue on race and criminal justice in Spring 2019 and the section hosted a panel at the conference in which the journal authors discussed their articles. A financial report was also provided to the members. Members also discussed the idea of using the web page to showcase achievements by members should be attempted again. Members agreed to abandon the idea due to lack interest by the members. After the formal meeting, members enjoyed an informal banquet.






Other Section Meeting Photos